emotion_con_2_roi_9

   08 29 2016     5 significant results (plus 4 one-sample T-tests)

INPUT AND OUTPUT FILE(S)

| Input file(1): SPM_roi_emotion_connect_4groups_s1_metafile_29-Aug-2016_RECODED_RECODED.txt
| Output file : emotion_con_2_roi_9.txt



NOTE: replacing the first column of all data with ascending subject number

SELECTING SUBJECTS


CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED CONTRASTS

| Available contrasts :
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected contrasts :
0002




CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED ROIS

| Available ROIs :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected ROIs :
9




NaN SUBJECTS






GROUP CHARACTERISTICS

| grouping variables: (1) group_hc_sib (2) stress_yn
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (1)
| group : hc nostress (n = 16)
| mean age +/- SD : 31.58 +/- 7.37 years
| total / males / females : 16 / 16 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (2)
| group : hc stress (n = 17)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.81 +/- 8.87 years
| total / males / females : 17 / 17 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (3)
| group : sib nostress (n = 17)
| mean age +/- SD : 33.89 +/- 11.29 years
| total / males / females : 17 / 17 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (4)
| group : sib stress (n = 15)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.01 +/- 6.09 years
| total / males / females : 15 / 15 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TOTAL
| mean age +/- SD : 33.13 +/- 8.61 years
| total / males / females : 65 / 65 / 0




MEAN AND SD

| hc nostress : mean for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 0.57 +/- 0.30
| hc stress : mean for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 0.29 +/- 0.37
| sib nostress : mean for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 0.52 +/- 0.28
| sib stress : mean for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 0.48 +/- 0.35




ONE-SAMPLE T-TESTS

| hc nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(15) = 7.76; p < 0.001 ***
| hc nostress (n = 16) : data for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : mean = 0.57 +/- 0.07 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(16) = 3.14; p < 0.01 **
| hc stress (n = 17) : data for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : mean = 0.29 +/- 0.09 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(16) = 7.65; p < 0.001 ***
| sib nostress (n = 17) : data for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : mean = 0.52 +/- 0.07 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(14) = 5.30; p < 0.001 ***
| sib stress (n = 15) : data for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : mean = 0.48 +/- 0.09 (SEM)




OUTLIERS and MISSINGS

| Outliers for group: hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Dixon's Q outlier for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 11
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 11
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 30
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 48
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Dixon's Q outlier for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 63
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 63
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002 (have value 9999)





All missings based on x_var value

| All missings:




ANOVA ACROSS GROUPS

| Main effect of group_hc_sib for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : F(1,61) = 0.72; p = 0.40
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Main effect of stress_yn for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : F(1,61) = 4.32; p = 0.04 *
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Interaction effect of group_hc_sib vs. stress_yn for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : F(1,61) = 2.20; p = 0.14
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05




TWO-SAMPLES TTESTS

| hc nostress (N = 16) vs. hc stress (N = 17) for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(31) = 2.45; p = 0.02 *
| hc nostress (N = 16) vs. sib nostress (N = 17) for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(31) = 0.51; p = 0.61
| hc nostress (N = 16) vs. sib stress (N = 15) for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(29) = 0.86; p = 0.40
| hc stress (N = 17) vs. sib nostress (N = 17) for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(32) = -2.09; p = 0.04 *
| hc stress (N = 17) vs. sib stress (N = 15) for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(30) = -1.48; p = 0.15
| sib nostress (N = 17) vs. sib stress (N = 15) for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(30) = 0.43; p = 0.67




REGRESSION ANALYSIS - Linear

| hc nostress : regression SPM roi 9 con 0002 by cort AUCi : F(1,15) = 0.08, p = 0.79 (r = -0.07)
| hc stress : regression SPM roi 9 con 0002 by cort AUCi : F(1,16) = 2.94, p = 0.11 (r = 0.40)
| sib nostress : regression SPM roi 9 con 0002 by cort AUCi : F(1,15) = 0.01, p = 0.93 (r = -0.03)
| sib stress : regression SPM roi 9 con 0002 by cort AUCi : F(1,12) = 0.20, p = 0.67 (r = -0.13)




regression across all groups for SPM roi 9 con 0002

| NOTE! main effect of group over all subgroups
| main effect subgroups F(3,54) = 2.71, p = 0.05 (partial eta^2 = 0.94)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,54) = 1.08, p = 0.30 (r = 0.04)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(3,54) = 0.86, p = 0.47
MANCOVAN - added as a check for aoctool
| main effect groups F(1,54) = 1.78, p = 0.12
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,54) = 0.91, p = 0.46
| interaction effect cort AUCi F(2,54) = 0.86, p = 0.47
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus hc stress for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,29) = 7.77, p = 0.01 ** (partial eta^2 = 0.99)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,29) = 2.65, p = 0.11 (r = 0.17)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,29) = 0.76, p = 0.39
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,28) = 0.30, p = 0.59 (partial eta^2 = 0.05)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,28) = 0.05, p = 0.82 (r = -0.04)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,28) = 0.03, p = 0.86
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,25) = 0.26, p = 0.62 (partial eta^2 = 0.04)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,25) = 0.30, p = 0.59 (r = -0.22)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,25) = 0.00, p = 0.97
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,29) = 5.49, p = 0.03 * (partial eta^2 = 0.96)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,29) = 2.49, p = 0.13 (r = 0.17)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,29) = 0.91, p = 0.35
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib stress for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,26) = 0.44, p = 0.51 (partial eta^2 = 0.10)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,26) = 1.46, p = 0.24 (r = 0.27)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,26) = 1.58, p = 0.22
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,25) = 0.07, p = 0.79 (partial eta^2 = 0.01)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,25) = 0.18, p = 0.68 (r = -0.15)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,25) = 0.07, p = 0.79




HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS

| SPM roi 9 con 0002
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for hc nostress : 11
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for hc stress : 30
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib nostress : 47
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib nostress : 48
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib stress : 61