emotion_con_2_roi_3

   08 29 2016     3 significant results (plus 4 one-sample T-tests)

INPUT AND OUTPUT FILE(S)

| Input file(1): SPM_roi_emotion_connect_4groups_s1_metafile_29-Aug-2016_RECODED_RECODED.txt
| Output file : emotion_con_2_roi_3.txt



NOTE: replacing the first column of all data with ascending subject number

SELECTING SUBJECTS


CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED CONTRASTS

| Available contrasts :
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected contrasts :
0002




CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED ROIS

| Available ROIs :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected ROIs :
3




NaN SUBJECTS






GROUP CHARACTERISTICS

| grouping variables: (1) group_hc_sib (2) stress_yn
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (1)
| group : hc nostress (n = 16)
| mean age +/- SD : 31.58 +/- 7.37 years
| total / males / females : 16 / 16 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (2)
| group : hc stress (n = 17)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.81 +/- 8.87 years
| total / males / females : 17 / 17 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (3)
| group : sib nostress (n = 17)
| mean age +/- SD : 33.89 +/- 11.29 years
| total / males / females : 17 / 17 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (4)
| group : sib stress (n = 15)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.01 +/- 6.09 years
| total / males / females : 15 / 15 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TOTAL
| mean age +/- SD : 33.13 +/- 8.61 years
| total / males / females : 65 / 65 / 0




MEAN AND SD

| hc nostress : mean for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : 0.80 +/- 0.39
| hc stress : mean for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : 0.45 +/- 0.49
| sib nostress : mean for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : 0.80 +/- 0.58
| sib stress : mean for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : 0.73 +/- 0.50




ONE-SAMPLE T-TESTS

| hc nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(15) = 8.20; p < 0.001 ***
| hc nostress (n = 16) : data for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : mean = 0.80 +/- 0.10 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(16) = 3.80; p < 0.01 **
| hc stress (n = 17) : data for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : mean = 0.45 +/- 0.12 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(16) = 5.73; p < 0.001 ***
| sib nostress (n = 17) : data for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : mean = 0.80 +/- 0.14 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(14) = 5.63; p < 0.001 ***
| sib stress (n = 15) : data for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : mean = 0.73 +/- 0.13 (SEM)




OUTLIERS and MISSINGS

| Outliers for group: hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : 11
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : 31
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : 36
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : 64
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002 (have value 9999)





All missings based on x_var value

| All missings:




ANOVA ACROSS GROUPS

| Main effect of group_hc_sib for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : F(1,61) = 1.27; p = 0.26
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Main effect of stress_yn for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : F(1,61) = 2.85; p = 0.10
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Interaction effect of group_hc_sib vs. stress_yn for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : F(1,61) = 1.31; p = 0.26
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05




TWO-SAMPLES TTESTS

| hc nostress (N = 16) vs. hc stress (N = 17) for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(31) = 2.25; p = 0.03 *
| hc nostress (N = 16) vs. sib nostress (N = 17) for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(31) = 0.01; p = 0.99
| hc nostress (N = 16) vs. sib stress (N = 15) for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(29) = 0.43; p = 0.67
| hc stress (N = 17) vs. sib nostress (N = 17) for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(32) = -1.89; p = 0.07
| hc stress (N = 17) vs. sib stress (N = 15) for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(30) = -1.59; p = 0.12
| sib nostress (N = 17) vs. sib stress (N = 15) for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(30) = 0.35; p = 0.73




REGRESSION ANALYSIS - Linear

| hc nostress : regression SPM roi 3 con 0002 by cort AUCi : F(1,15) = 0.34, p = 0.57 (r = -0.15)
| hc stress : regression SPM roi 3 con 0002 by cort AUCi : F(1,16) = 0.14, p = 0.72 (r = 0.09)
| sib nostress : regression SPM roi 3 con 0002 by cort AUCi : F(1,15) = 1.20, p = 0.29 (r = 0.28)
| sib stress : regression SPM roi 3 con 0002 by cort AUCi : F(1,12) = 1.62, p = 0.23 (r = -0.36)




regression across all groups for SPM roi 3 con 0002

| NOTE! main effect of group over all subgroups
| main effect subgroups F(3,54) = 1.85, p = 0.15 (partial eta^2 = 0.91)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,54) = 0.00, p = 0.95 (r = -0.04)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(3,54) = 1.23, p = 0.31
MANCOVAN - added as a check for aoctool
| main effect groups F(1,54) = 1.54, p = 0.18
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,54) = 0.92, p = 0.46
| interaction effect cort AUCi F(2,54) = 1.23, p = 0.31
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus hc stress for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,29) = 4.79, p = 0.04 * (partial eta^2 = 0.96)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,29) = 0.04, p = 0.84 (r = -0.04)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,29) = 0.38, p = 0.54
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,28) = 0.03, p = 0.86 (partial eta^2 = 0.01)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,28) = 0.63, p = 0.43 (r = 0.14)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,28) = 1.21, p = 0.28
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,25) = 0.43, p = 0.52 (partial eta^2 = 0.15)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,25) = 2.27, p = 0.14 (r = -0.27)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,25) = 0.11, p = 0.74
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,29) = 4.38, p = 0.05 * (partial eta^2 = 0.97)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,29) = 0.74, p = 0.40 (r = 0.06)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,29) = 0.75, p = 0.39
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib stress for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,26) = 2.23, p = 0.15 (partial eta^2 = 0.80)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,26) = 0.13, p = 0.72 (r = 0.02)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,26) = 1.71, p = 0.20
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,25) = 0.07, p = 0.80 (partial eta^2 = 0.03)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,25) = 0.02, p = 0.90 (r = -0.07)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,25) = 2.73, p = 0.11




HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS

| SPM roi 3 con 0002
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for hc nostress : 9
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for hc nostress : 11
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib nostress : 42
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib nostress : 47
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib nostress : 48
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib stress : 53