emotion_con_2_roi_10

   08 29 2016     6 significant results (plus 4 one-sample T-tests)

INPUT AND OUTPUT FILE(S)

| Input file(1): SPM_roi_emotion_connect_4groups_s1_metafile_29-Aug-2016_RECODED_RECODED.txt
| Output file : emotion_con_2_roi_10.txt



NOTE: replacing the first column of all data with ascending subject number

SELECTING SUBJECTS


CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED CONTRASTS

| Available contrasts :
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected contrasts :
0002




CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED ROIS

| Available ROIs :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected ROIs :
10




NaN SUBJECTS






GROUP CHARACTERISTICS

| grouping variables: (1) group_hc_sib (2) stress_yn
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (1)
| group : hc nostress (n = 16)
| mean age +/- SD : 31.58 +/- 7.37 years
| total / males / females : 16 / 16 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (2)
| group : hc stress (n = 17)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.81 +/- 8.87 years
| total / males / females : 17 / 17 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (3)
| group : sib nostress (n = 17)
| mean age +/- SD : 33.89 +/- 11.29 years
| total / males / females : 17 / 17 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (4)
| group : sib stress (n = 15)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.01 +/- 6.09 years
| total / males / females : 15 / 15 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TOTAL
| mean age +/- SD : 33.13 +/- 8.61 years
| total / males / females : 65 / 65 / 0




MEAN AND SD

| hc nostress : mean for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 0.62 +/- 0.34
| hc stress : mean for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 0.32 +/- 0.42
| sib nostress : mean for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 0.67 +/- 0.65
| sib stress : mean for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 0.48 +/- 0.41




ONE-SAMPLE T-TESTS

| hc nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(15) = 7.32; p < 0.001 ***
| hc nostress (n = 16) : data for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : mean = 0.62 +/- 0.08 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(16) = 3.13; p < 0.01 **
| hc stress (n = 17) : data for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : mean = 0.32 +/- 0.10 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(16) = 4.27; p < 0.001 ***
| sib nostress (n = 17) : data for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : mean = 0.67 +/- 0.16 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(14) = 4.55; p < 0.001 ***
| sib stress (n = 15) : data for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : mean = 0.48 +/- 0.11 (SEM)




OUTLIERS and MISSINGS

| Outliers for group: hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 7
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 30
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Dixon's Q outlier for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 46
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 46
| Outlier for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 46
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 55
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002 (have value 9999)





All missings based on x_var value

| All missings:




ANOVA ACROSS GROUPS

| Main effect of group_hc_sib for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : F(1,61) = 0.89; p = 0.35
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Main effect of stress_yn for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : F(1,61) = 4.49; p = 0.04 *
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Interaction effect of group_hc_sib vs. stress_yn for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : F(1,61) = 0.21; p = 0.65
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05




TWO-SAMPLES TTESTS

| hc nostress (N = 16) vs. hc stress (N = 17) for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(31) = 2.28; p = 0.03 *
| hc nostress (N = 16) vs. sib nostress (N = 17) for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(31) = -0.31; p = 0.76
| hc nostress (N = 16) vs. sib stress (N = 15) for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(29) = 1.03; p = 0.31
| hc stress (N = 17) vs. sib nostress (N = 17) for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(32) = -1.92; p = 0.06
| hc stress (N = 17) vs. sib stress (N = 15) for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(30) = -1.13; p = 0.27
| sib nostress (N = 17) vs. sib stress (N = 15) for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(30) = 1.00; p = 0.33




REGRESSION ANALYSIS - Linear

| hc nostress : regression SPM roi 10 con 0002 by cort AUCi : F(1,15) = 0.34, p = 0.57 (r = -0.15)
| hc stress : regression SPM roi 10 con 0002 by cort AUCi : F(1,16) = 4.89, p = 0.04 (r = 0.50) *
| sib nostress : regression SPM roi 10 con 0002 by cort AUCi : F(1,15) = 0.13, p = 0.72 (r = 0.10)
| sib stress : regression SPM roi 10 con 0002 by cort AUCi : F(1,12) = 1.29, p = 0.28 (r = -0.32)




regression across all groups for SPM roi 10 con 0002

| NOTE! main effect of group over all subgroups
| main effect subgroups F(3,54) = 2.49, p = 0.07 (partial eta^2 = 0.96)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,54) = 0.98, p = 0.33 (r = 0.00)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(3,54) = 1.12, p = 0.35
MANCOVAN - added as a check for aoctool
| main effect groups F(1,54) = 1.81, p = 0.12
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,54) = 1.09, p = 0.37
| interaction effect cort AUCi F(2,54) = 1.12, p = 0.35
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus hc stress for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,29) = 7.64, p = 0.01 ** (partial eta^2 = 0.99)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,29) = 3.82, p = 0.06 (r = 0.22)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,29) = 1.75, p = 0.20
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,28) = 0.12, p = 0.73 (partial eta^2 = 0.05)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,28) = 0.03, p = 0.86 (r = 0.03)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,28) = 0.32, p = 0.58
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,25) = 0.11, p = 0.74 (partial eta^2 = 0.02)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,25) = 1.72, p = 0.20 (r = -0.37)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,25) = 0.02, p = 0.88
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,29) = 4.95, p = 0.03 * (partial eta^2 = 0.98)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,29) = 2.36, p = 0.14 (r = 0.17)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,29) = 0.10, p = 0.76
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib stress for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,26) = 0.04, p = 0.84 (partial eta^2 = 0.01)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,26) = 1.66, p = 0.21 (r = 0.25)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,26) = 4.48, p = 0.04 *
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,25) = 0.70, p = 0.41 (partial eta^2 = 0.36)
| main effect cort AUCi F(1,25) = 0.07, p = 0.80 (r = -0.19)
| interaction effect subgroups x cort AUCi F(1,25) = 0.69, p = 0.41




HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS

| SPM roi 10 con 0002
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for hc nostress : 11
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for hc stress : 30
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib nostress : 45
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib stress : 61