emotion_con_2_roi_64

   08 30 2016     2 significant results (plus 4 one-sample T-tests)

INPUT AND OUTPUT FILE(S)

| Input file(1): SPM_roi_emotion_connect_4groups_s1_metafile_30-Aug-2016_RECODED_RECODED_means.txt
| Output file : emotion_con_2_roi_64.txt



NOTE: replacing the first column of all data with ascending subject number

SELECTING SUBJECTS


CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED CONTRASTS

| Available contrasts :
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected contrasts :
0002




CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED ROIS

| Available ROIs :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
28
64
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected ROIs :
64




NaN SUBJECTS






GROUP CHARACTERISTICS

| grouping variables: (1) group_hc_sib (2) stress_yn
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (1)
| group : hc nostress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.51 +/- 8.66 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (2)
| group : hc stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.48 +/- 8.72 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (3)
| group : sib nostress (n = 20)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.86 +/- 11.21 years
| total / males / females : 20 / 20 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (4)
| group : sib stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.73 +/- 7.42 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TOTAL
| mean age +/- SD : 33.68 +/- 9.04 years
| total / males / females : 74 / 74 / 0




MEAN AND SD

| hc nostress : mean for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : 0.85 +/- 0.45
| hc stress : mean for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : 0.49 +/- 0.58
| sib nostress : mean for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : 0.85 +/- 0.57
| sib stress : mean for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : 0.79 +/- 0.54




ONE-SAMPLE T-TESTS

| hc nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 64 con 0002 : t(17) = 8.10; p < 0.001 ***
| hc nostress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : mean = 0.85 +/- 0.11 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 64 con 0002 : t(17) = 3.54; p < 0.01 **
| hc stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : mean = 0.49 +/- 0.14 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 64 con 0002 : t(19) = 6.69; p < 0.001 ***
| sib nostress (n = 20) : data for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : mean = 0.85 +/- 0.13 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 64 con 0002 : t(17) = 6.22; p < 0.001 ***
| sib stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : mean = 0.79 +/- 0.13 (SEM)




OUTLIERS and MISSINGS

| Outliers for group: hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 64 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : 11
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 64 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 64 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 64 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 64 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : 32
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 64 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 64 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 64 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 64 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : 49
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 64 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 64 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 64 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 64 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : 61
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 64 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 64 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 64 con 0002 (have value 9999)





All missings based on x_var value

| All missings:




ANOVA ACROSS GROUPS

| Main effect of group_hc_sib for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : F(1,70) = 1.44; p = 0.23
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Main effect of stress_yn for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : F(1,70) = 2.87; p = 0.09
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Interaction effect of group_hc_sib vs. stress_yn for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : F(1,70) = 1.47; p = 0.23
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05




TWO-SAMPLES TTESTS

| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. hc stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : t(34) = 2.10; p = 0.04 *
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : t(36) = 0.01; p = 0.99
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : t(34) = 0.38; p = 0.71
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : t(36) = -1.94; p = 0.06
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : t(34) = -1.61; p = 0.12
| sib nostress (N = 20) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 64 con 0002 : t(36) = 0.33; p = 0.74




REGRESSION ANALYSIS - Linear

| hc nostress : regression SPM roi 64 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 0.76, p = 0.40 (r = -0.21)
| hc stress : regression SPM roi 64 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 1.80, p = 0.20 (r = 0.32)
| sib nostress : regression SPM roi 64 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,19) = 0.04, p = 0.84 (r = -0.05)
| sib stress : regression SPM roi 64 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 1.78, p = 0.20 (r = 0.32)




regression across all groups for SPM roi 64 con 0002

| NOTE! main effect of group over all subgroups
| main effect subgroups F(3,66) = 1.77, p = 0.16 (partial eta^2 = 0.90)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 0.58, p = 0.45 (r = 0.12)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(3,66) = 1.26, p = 0.30
MANCOVAN - added as a check for aoctool
| main effect groups F(1,66) = 1.51, p = 0.19
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 1.09, p = 0.37
| interaction effect cortisol5 F(2,66) = 1.26, p = 0.30
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus hc stress for SPM roi 64 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 4.37, p = 0.04 * (partial eta^2 = 0.96)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.07, p = 0.79 (r = 0.08)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 2.74, p = 0.11
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 64 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.00, p = 0.98 (partial eta^2 = 0.00)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.43, p = 0.51 (r = -0.11)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.18, p = 0.67
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 64 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 0.18, p = 0.67 (partial eta^2 = 0.06)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.34, p = 0.57 (r = 0.09)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 2.37, p = 0.13
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 64 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 3.35, p = 0.08 (partial eta^2 = 0.94)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.26, p = 0.61 (r = 0.13)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 1.55, p = 0.22
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib stress for SPM roi 64 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 1.70, p = 0.20 (partial eta^2 = 0.72)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 3.32, p = 0.08 (r = 0.34)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.27, p = 0.61
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 64 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.12, p = 0.73 (partial eta^2 = 0.05)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.53, p = 0.47 (r = 0.12)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 1.11, p = 0.30




HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS

| SPM roi 64 con 0002
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib nostress : 50
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib nostress : 56
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for sib stress