emotion_con_1_roi_64

   08 30 2016     6 significant results (plus 3 one-sample T-tests)

INPUT AND OUTPUT FILE(S)

| Input file(1): SPM_roi_emotion_connect_4groups_s1_metafile_30-Aug-2016_RECODED_RECODED_means.txt
| Output file : emotion_con_1_roi_64.txt



NOTE: replacing the first column of all data with ascending subject number

SELECTING SUBJECTS


CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED CONTRASTS

| Available contrasts :
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected contrasts :
0001




CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED ROIS

| Available ROIs :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
28
64
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected ROIs :
64




NaN SUBJECTS






GROUP CHARACTERISTICS

| grouping variables: (1) group_hc_sib (2) stress_yn
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (1)
| group : hc nostress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.51 +/- 8.66 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (2)
| group : hc stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.48 +/- 8.72 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (3)
| group : sib nostress (n = 20)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.86 +/- 11.21 years
| total / males / females : 20 / 20 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (4)
| group : sib stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.73 +/- 7.42 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TOTAL
| mean age +/- SD : 33.68 +/- 9.04 years
| total / males / females : 74 / 74 / 0




MEAN AND SD

| hc nostress : mean for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : 0.63 +/- 0.40
| hc stress : mean for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : 0.13 +/- 0.64
| sib nostress : mean for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : 0.56 +/- 0.54
| sib stress : mean for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : 0.50 +/- 0.60




ONE-SAMPLE T-TESTS

| hc nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 64 con 0001 : t(17) = 6.67; p < 0.001 ***
| hc nostress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : mean = 0.63 +/- 0.09 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 64 con 0001 : t(17) = 0.86; p = 0.40
| hc stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : mean = 0.13 +/- 0.15 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 64 con 0001 : t(19) = 4.66; p < 0.001 ***
| sib nostress (n = 20) : data for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : mean = 0.56 +/- 0.12 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 64 con 0001 : t(17) = 3.55; p < 0.01 **
| sib stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : mean = 0.50 +/- 0.14 (SEM)




OUTLIERS and MISSINGS

| Outliers for group: hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : 7
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : 25
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : 49
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001
| No outliers based on Rosner's many outlier test detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 64 con 0001 (have value 9999)





All missings based on x_var value

| All missings:




ANOVA ACROSS GROUPS

| Main effect of group_hc_sib for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : F(1,70) = 1.43; p = 0.24
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Main effect of stress_yn for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : F(1,70) = 4.73; p = 0.03 *
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Interaction effect of group_hc_sib vs. stress_yn for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : F(1,70) = 2.92; p = 0.09
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05




TWO-SAMPLES TTESTS

| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. hc stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : t(34) = 2.81; p < 0.01 **
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : t(36) = 0.42; p = 0.68
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : t(34) = 0.74; p = 0.46
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : t(36) = -2.26; p = 0.03 *
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : t(34) = -1.80; p = 0.08
| sib nostress (N = 20) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 64 con 0001 : t(36) = 0.32; p = 0.75




REGRESSION ANALYSIS - Linear

| hc nostress : regression SPM roi 64 con 0001 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 0.37, p = 0.55 (r = -0.15)
| hc stress : regression SPM roi 64 con 0001 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 1.25, p = 0.28 (r = 0.27)
| sib nostress : regression SPM roi 64 con 0001 by cortisol5 : F(1,19) = 0.00, p = 0.99 (r = -0.00)
| sib stress : regression SPM roi 64 con 0001 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 1.36, p = 0.26 (r = 0.28)




regression across all groups for SPM roi 64 con 0001

| NOTE! main effect of group over all subgroups
| main effect subgroups F(3,66) = 2.75, p = 0.05 * (partial eta^2 = 0.98)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 0.88, p = 0.35 (r = 0.14)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(3,66) = 0.84, p = 0.48
MANCOVAN - added as a check for aoctool
| main effect groups F(1,66) = 1.79, p = 0.11
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 0.85, p = 0.50
| interaction effect cortisol5 F(2,66) = 0.84, p = 0.48
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus hc stress for SPM roi 64 con 0001
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 7.56, p = 0.01 ** (partial eta^2 = 1.00)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.17, p = 0.68 (r = 0.11)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 1.82, p = 0.19
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 64 con 0001
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.15, p = 0.70 (partial eta^2 = 0.05)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.11, p = 0.74 (r = -0.06)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.14, p = 0.71
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 64 con 0001
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 0.63, p = 0.43 (partial eta^2 = 0.28)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.53, p = 0.47 (r = 0.11)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 1.55, p = 0.22
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 64 con 0001
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 4.52, p = 0.04 * (partial eta^2 = 0.97)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.38, p = 0.54 (r = 0.15)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 1.06, p = 0.31
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib stress for SPM roi 64 con 0001
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 2.29, p = 0.14 (partial eta^2 = 0.86)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 2.45, p = 0.13 (r = 0.30)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.16, p = 0.69
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 64 con 0001
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.12, p = 0.73 (partial eta^2 = 0.05)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.71, p = 0.41 (r = 0.14)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.75, p = 0.39




HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS

| SPM roi 64 con 0001
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for hc stress : 34
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for sib nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for sib stress