emotion_con_3_roi_9

   08 30 2016     7 significant results (plus 4 one-sample T-tests)

INPUT AND OUTPUT FILE(S)

| Input file(1): SPM_roi_emotion_connect_4groups_s1_metafile_30-Aug-2016_RECODED_RECODED.txt
| Output file : emotion_con_3_roi_9.txt



NOTE: replacing the first column of all data with ascending subject number

SELECTING SUBJECTS


CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED CONTRASTS

| Available contrasts :
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected contrasts :
0003




CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED ROIS

| Available ROIs :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected ROIs :
9




NaN SUBJECTS






GROUP CHARACTERISTICS

| grouping variables: (1) group_hc_sib (2) stress_yn
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (1)
| group : hc nostress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.51 +/- 8.66 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (2)
| group : hc stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.48 +/- 8.72 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (3)
| group : sib nostress (n = 20)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.86 +/- 11.21 years
| total / males / females : 20 / 20 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (4)
| group : sib stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.73 +/- 7.42 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TOTAL
| mean age +/- SD : 33.68 +/- 9.04 years
| total / males / females : 74 / 74 / 0




MEAN AND SD

| hc nostress : mean for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : 0.51 +/- 0.35
| hc stress : mean for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : 0.25 +/- 0.36
| sib nostress : mean for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : 0.50 +/- 0.28
| sib stress : mean for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : 0.57 +/- 0.41




ONE-SAMPLE T-TESTS

| hc nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 9 con 0003 : t(17) = 6.23; p < 0.001 ***
| hc nostress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : mean = 0.51 +/- 0.08 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 9 con 0003 : t(17) = 2.87; p = 0.01 *
| hc stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : mean = 0.25 +/- 0.09 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 9 con 0003 : t(19) = 8.10; p < 0.001 ***
| sib nostress (n = 20) : data for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : mean = 0.50 +/- 0.06 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 9 con 0003 : t(17) = 5.86; p < 0.001 ***
| sib stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : mean = 0.57 +/- 0.10 (SEM)




OUTLIERS and MISSINGS

| Outliers for group: hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 9 con 0003
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : 1
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0003
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0003 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 9 con 0003 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 9 con 0003
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : 32
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0003
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0003 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 9 con 0003 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 9 con 0003
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : 50
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0003
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0003 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 9 con 0003 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 9 con 0003
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : 74
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0003
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0003 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 9 con 0003 (have value 9999)





All missings based on x_var value

| All missings:




ANOVA ACROSS GROUPS

| Main effect of group_hc_sib for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : F(1,70) = 3.67; p = 0.06
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Main effect of stress_yn for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : F(1,70) = 1.47; p = 0.23
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Interaction effect of group_hc_sib vs. stress_yn for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : F(1,70) = 4.14; p = 0.05 *
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05




TWO-SAMPLES TTESTS

| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. hc stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : t(34) = 2.24; p = 0.03 *
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : t(36) = 0.09; p = 0.93
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : t(34) = -0.45; p = 0.65
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : t(36) = -2.46; p = 0.02 *
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : t(34) = -2.50; p = 0.02 *
| sib nostress (N = 20) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 9 con 0003 : t(36) = -0.59; p = 0.56




REGRESSION ANALYSIS - Linear

| hc nostress : regression SPM roi 9 con 0003 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 0.01, p = 0.93 (r = -0.02)
| hc stress : regression SPM roi 9 con 0003 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 2.21, p = 0.16 (r = 0.35)
| sib nostress : regression SPM roi 9 con 0003 by cortisol5 : F(1,19) = 0.71, p = 0.41 (r = 0.19)
| sib stress : regression SPM roi 9 con 0003 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 1.63, p = 0.22 (r = 0.30)




regression across all groups for SPM roi 9 con 0003

| NOTE! main effect of group over all subgroups
| main effect subgroups F(3,66) = 2.63, p = 0.06 (partial eta^2 = 0.94)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 2.89, p = 0.09 (r = 0.23)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(3,66) = 0.66, p = 0.58
MANCOVAN - added as a check for aoctool
| main effect groups F(1,66) = 1.65, p = 0.15
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 1.22, p = 0.31
| interaction effect cortisol5 F(2,66) = 0.66, p = 0.58
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus hc stress for SPM roi 9 con 0003
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 4.65, p = 0.04 * (partial eta^2 = 0.94)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.63, p = 0.43 (r = 0.16)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 1.54, p = 0.22
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 9 con 0003
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.01, p = 0.90 (partial eta^2 = 0.00)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.25, p = 0.62 (r = 0.08)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.30, p = 0.59
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 9 con 0003
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 0.14, p = 0.71 (partial eta^2 = 0.03)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.95, p = 0.34 (r = 0.17)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.87, p = 0.36
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 9 con 0003
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 5.04, p = 0.03 * (partial eta^2 = 0.94)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 2.25, p = 0.14 (r = 0.28)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 1.06, p = 0.31
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib stress for SPM roi 9 con 0003
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 4.78, p = 0.04 * (partial eta^2 = 0.95)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 3.55, p = 0.07 (r = 0.35)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.21, p = 0.65
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 9 con 0003
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.32, p = 0.58 (partial eta^2 = 0.06)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 2.38, p = 0.13 (r = 0.26)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.34, p = 0.56




HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS

| SPM roi 9 con 0003
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib nostress : 50
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for sib stress