emotion_con_3_roi_10_nsig

   08 30 2016     0 significant results (plus 4 one-sample T-tests)

INPUT AND OUTPUT FILE(S)

| Input file(1): SPM_roi_emotion_connect_4groups_s1_metafile_30-Aug-2016_RECODED_RECODED.txt
| Output file : emotion_con_3_roi_10.txt



NOTE: replacing the first column of all data with ascending subject number

SELECTING SUBJECTS


CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED CONTRASTS

| Available contrasts :
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected contrasts :
0003




CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED ROIS

| Available ROIs :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected ROIs :
10




NaN SUBJECTS






GROUP CHARACTERISTICS

| grouping variables: (1) group_hc_sib (2) stress_yn
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (1)
| group : hc nostress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.51 +/- 8.66 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (2)
| group : hc stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.48 +/- 8.72 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (3)
| group : sib nostress (n = 20)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.86 +/- 11.21 years
| total / males / females : 20 / 20 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (4)
| group : sib stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.73 +/- 7.42 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TOTAL
| mean age +/- SD : 33.68 +/- 9.04 years
| total / males / females : 74 / 74 / 0




MEAN AND SD

| hc nostress : mean for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : 0.61 +/- 0.45
| hc stress : mean for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : 0.32 +/- 0.39
| sib nostress : mean for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : 0.64 +/- 0.61
| sib stress : mean for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : 0.51 +/- 0.45




ONE-SAMPLE T-TESTS

| hc nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 10 con 0003 : t(17) = 5.75; p < 0.001 ***
| hc nostress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : mean = 0.61 +/- 0.11 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 10 con 0003 : t(17) = 3.48; p < 0.01 **
| hc stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : mean = 0.32 +/- 0.09 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 10 con 0003 : t(19) = 4.68; p < 0.001 ***
| sib nostress (n = 20) : data for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : mean = 0.64 +/- 0.14 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 10 con 0003 : t(17) = 4.81; p < 0.001 ***
| sib stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : mean = 0.51 +/- 0.11 (SEM)




OUTLIERS and MISSINGS

| Outliers for group: hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 10 con 0003
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : 7
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0003
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0003 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 10 con 0003 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 10 con 0003
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : 32
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0003
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0003 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 10 con 0003 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Dixon's Q outlier for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : 49
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : 49
| Outlier for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : 49
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0003 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 10 con 0003 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 10 con 0003
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : 59
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0003
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0003 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 10 con 0003 (have value 9999)





All missings based on x_var value

| All missings:




ANOVA ACROSS GROUPS

| Main effect of group_hc_sib for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : F(1,70) = 0.99; p = 0.32
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Main effect of stress_yn for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : F(1,70) = 3.36; p = 0.07
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Interaction effect of group_hc_sib vs. stress_yn for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : F(1,70) = 0.46; p = 0.50
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05




TWO-SAMPLES TTESTS

| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. hc stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : t(34) = 2.03; p = 0.05
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : t(36) = -0.21; p = 0.84
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : t(34) = 0.63; p = 0.53
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : t(36) = -1.90; p = 0.07
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : t(34) = -1.35; p = 0.19
| sib nostress (N = 20) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 10 con 0003 : t(36) = 0.75; p = 0.46




REGRESSION ANALYSIS - Linear

| hc nostress : regression SPM roi 10 con 0003 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 0.01, p = 0.94 (r = -0.02)
| hc stress : regression SPM roi 10 con 0003 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 1.42, p = 0.25 (r = 0.29)
| sib nostress : regression SPM roi 10 con 0003 by cortisol5 : F(1,19) = 0.02, p = 0.89 (r = -0.03)
| sib stress : regression SPM roi 10 con 0003 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 0.25, p = 0.62 (r = 0.12)




regression across all groups for SPM roi 10 con 0003

| NOTE! main effect of group over all subgroups
| main effect subgroups F(3,66) = 1.47, p = 0.23 (partial eta^2 = 0.83)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 0.21, p = 0.65 (r = 0.08)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(3,66) = 0.30, p = 0.82
MANCOVAN - added as a check for aoctool
| main effect groups F(1,66) = 0.88, p = 0.51
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 0.28, p = 0.89
| interaction effect cortisol5 F(2,66) = 0.30, p = 0.82
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus hc stress for SPM roi 10 con 0003
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 3.76, p = 0.06 (partial eta^2 = 0.92)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.33, p = 0.57 (r = 0.13)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.85, p = 0.36
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 10 con 0003
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.04, p = 0.83 (partial eta^2 = 0.02)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.03, p = 0.87 (r = -0.03)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.00, p = 0.96
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 10 con 0003
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 0.41, p = 0.52 (partial eta^2 = 0.14)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.11, p = 0.74 (r = 0.05)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.14, p = 0.71
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 10 con 0003
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 3.23, p = 0.08 (partial eta^2 = 0.92)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.10, p = 0.76 (r = 0.10)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.69, p = 0.41
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib stress for SPM roi 10 con 0003
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 1.28, p = 0.27 (partial eta^2 = 0.47)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 1.06, p = 0.31 (r = 0.21)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.41, p = 0.53
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 10 con 0003
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.53, p = 0.47 (partial eta^2 = 0.26)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.03, p = 0.86 (r = 0.03)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.17, p = 0.69




HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS

| SPM roi 10 con 0003
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for sib nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for sib stress