emotion_con_2_roi_9

   08 30 2016     2 significant results (plus 4 one-sample T-tests)

INPUT AND OUTPUT FILE(S)

| Input file(1): SPM_roi_emotion_connect_4groups_s1_metafile_30-Aug-2016_RECODED_RECODED.txt
| Output file : emotion_con_2_roi_9.txt



NOTE: replacing the first column of all data with ascending subject number

SELECTING SUBJECTS


CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED CONTRASTS

| Available contrasts :
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected contrasts :
0002




CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED ROIS

| Available ROIs :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected ROIs :
9




NaN SUBJECTS






GROUP CHARACTERISTICS

| grouping variables: (1) group_hc_sib (2) stress_yn
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (1)
| group : hc nostress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.51 +/- 8.66 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (2)
| group : hc stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.48 +/- 8.72 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (3)
| group : sib nostress (n = 20)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.86 +/- 11.21 years
| total / males / females : 20 / 20 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (4)
| group : sib stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.73 +/- 7.42 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TOTAL
| mean age +/- SD : 33.68 +/- 9.04 years
| total / males / females : 74 / 74 / 0




MEAN AND SD

| hc nostress : mean for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 0.55 +/- 0.29
| hc stress : mean for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 0.32 +/- 0.38
| sib nostress : mean for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 0.52 +/- 0.32
| sib stress : mean for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 0.53 +/- 0.38




ONE-SAMPLE T-TESTS

| hc nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(17) = 8.02; p < 0.001 ***
| hc nostress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : mean = 0.55 +/- 0.07 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(17) = 3.48; p < 0.01 **
| hc stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : mean = 0.32 +/- 0.09 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(19) = 7.28; p < 0.001 ***
| sib nostress (n = 20) : data for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : mean = 0.52 +/- 0.07 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(17) = 5.98; p < 0.001 ***
| sib stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : mean = 0.53 +/- 0.09 (SEM)




OUTLIERS and MISSINGS

| Outliers for group: hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Dixon's Q outlier for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 11
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 11
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 32
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 52
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : 69
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 9 con 0002 (have value 9999)





All missings based on x_var value

| All missings:




ANOVA ACROSS GROUPS

| Main effect of group_hc_sib for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : F(1,70) = 1.36; p = 0.25
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Main effect of stress_yn for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : F(1,70) = 2.03; p = 0.16
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Interaction effect of group_hc_sib vs. stress_yn for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : F(1,70) = 2.37; p = 0.13
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05




TWO-SAMPLES TTESTS

| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. hc stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(34) = 2.09; p = 0.04 *
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(36) = 0.30; p = 0.77
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(34) = 0.18; p = 0.85
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(36) = -1.82; p = 0.08
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(34) = -1.71; p = 0.10
| sib nostress (N = 20) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 9 con 0002 : t(36) = -0.08; p = 0.94




REGRESSION ANALYSIS - Linear

| hc nostress : regression SPM roi 9 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 0.73, p = 0.41 (r = -0.21)
| hc stress : regression SPM roi 9 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 1.94, p = 0.18 (r = 0.33)
| sib nostress : regression SPM roi 9 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,19) = 0.00, p = 0.99 (r = 0.00)
| sib stress : regression SPM roi 9 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 2.27, p = 0.15 (r = 0.35)




regression across all groups for SPM roi 9 con 0002

| NOTE! main effect of group over all subgroups
| main effect subgroups F(3,66) = 1.72, p = 0.17 (partial eta^2 = 0.78)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 1.20, p = 0.28 (r = 0.15)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(3,66) = 1.41, p = 0.25
MANCOVAN - added as a check for aoctool
| main effect groups F(1,66) = 1.56, p = 0.17
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 1.36, p = 0.26
| interaction effect cortisol5 F(2,66) = 1.41, p = 0.25
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus hc stress for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 4.33, p = 0.05 * (partial eta^2 = 0.92)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.09, p = 0.76 (r = 0.08)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 2.86, p = 0.10
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.07, p = 0.79 (partial eta^2 = 0.01)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.25, p = 0.62 (r = -0.09)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.39, p = 0.54
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 0.06, p = 0.80 (partial eta^2 = 0.01)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.60, p = 0.44 (r = 0.13)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 2.72, p = 0.11
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 2.83, p = 0.10 (partial eta^2 = 0.78)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.61, p = 0.44 (r = 0.17)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 1.59, p = 0.22
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib stress for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 1.92, p = 0.18 (partial eta^2 = 0.60)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 4.02, p = 0.05 (r = 0.36)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.18, p = 0.67
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 9 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.00, p = 0.96 (partial eta^2 = 0.00)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 1.26, p = 0.27 (r = 0.19)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 1.24, p = 0.27




HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS

| SPM roi 9 con 0002
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib nostress : 50
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib nostress : 56
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib stress : 73