emotion_con_2_roi_4_nsig

   08 30 2016     0 significant results (plus 4 one-sample T-tests)

INPUT AND OUTPUT FILE(S)

| Input file(1): SPM_roi_emotion_connect_4groups_s1_metafile_30-Aug-2016_RECODED_RECODED.txt
| Output file : emotion_con_2_roi_4.txt



NOTE: replacing the first column of all data with ascending subject number

SELECTING SUBJECTS


CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED CONTRASTS

| Available contrasts :
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected contrasts :
0002




CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED ROIS

| Available ROIs :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected ROIs :
4




NaN SUBJECTS






GROUP CHARACTERISTICS

| grouping variables: (1) group_hc_sib (2) stress_yn
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (1)
| group : hc nostress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.51 +/- 8.66 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (2)
| group : hc stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.48 +/- 8.72 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (3)
| group : sib nostress (n = 20)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.86 +/- 11.21 years
| total / males / females : 20 / 20 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (4)
| group : sib stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.73 +/- 7.42 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TOTAL
| mean age +/- SD : 33.68 +/- 9.04 years
| total / males / females : 74 / 74 / 0




MEAN AND SD

| hc nostress : mean for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : 0.62 +/- 0.28
| hc stress : mean for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : 0.46 +/- 0.39
| sib nostress : mean for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : 0.57 +/- 0.36
| sib stress : mean for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : 0.55 +/- 0.48




ONE-SAMPLE T-TESTS

| hc nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 4 con 0002 : t(17) = 9.48; p < 0.001 ***
| hc nostress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : mean = 0.62 +/- 0.07 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 4 con 0002 : t(17) = 4.97; p < 0.001 ***
| hc stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : mean = 0.46 +/- 0.09 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 4 con 0002 : t(19) = 6.97; p < 0.001 ***
| sib nostress (n = 20) : data for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : mean = 0.57 +/- 0.08 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 4 con 0002 : t(17) = 4.83; p < 0.001 ***
| sib stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : mean = 0.55 +/- 0.11 (SEM)




OUTLIERS and MISSINGS

| Outliers for group: hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 4 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : 11
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 4 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 4 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 4 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 4 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : 33
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 4 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 4 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 4 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 4 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : 39
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 4 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 4 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 4 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 4 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : 70
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 4 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 4 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 4 con 0002 (have value 9999)





All missings based on x_var value

| All missings:




ANOVA ACROSS GROUPS

| Main effect of group_hc_sib for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : F(1,70) = 0.03; p = 0.86
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Main effect of stress_yn for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : F(1,70) = 0.98; p = 0.32
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Interaction effect of group_hc_sib vs. stress_yn for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : F(1,70) = 0.59; p = 0.44
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05




TWO-SAMPLES TTESTS

| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. hc stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : t(34) = 1.39; p = 0.17
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : t(36) = 0.50; p = 0.62
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : t(34) = 0.56; p = 0.58
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : t(36) = -0.85; p = 0.40
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : t(34) = -0.58; p = 0.57
| sib nostress (N = 20) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 4 con 0002 : t(36) = 0.15; p = 0.88




REGRESSION ANALYSIS - Linear

| hc nostress : regression SPM roi 4 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 0.01, p = 0.93 (r = -0.02)
| hc stress : regression SPM roi 4 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 2.43, p = 0.14 (r = 0.36)
| sib nostress : regression SPM roi 4 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,19) = 0.27, p = 0.61 (r = 0.12)
| sib stress : regression SPM roi 4 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 0.21, p = 0.65 (r = 0.11)




regression across all groups for SPM roi 4 con 0002

| NOTE! main effect of group over all subgroups
| main effect subgroups F(3,66) = 0.45, p = 0.72 (partial eta^2 = 0.22)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 1.24, p = 0.27 (r = 0.14)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(3,66) = 0.55, p = 0.65
MANCOVAN - added as a check for aoctool
| main effect groups F(1,66) = 0.50, p = 0.80
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 0.73, p = 0.58
| interaction effect cortisol5 F(2,66) = 0.55, p = 0.65
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus hc stress for SPM roi 4 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 1.71, p = 0.20 (partial eta^2 = 0.49)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.95, p = 0.34 (r = 0.18)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 2.15, p = 0.15
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 4 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.26, p = 0.61 (partial eta^2 = 0.05)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.15, p = 0.70 (r = 0.06)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.18, p = 0.67
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 4 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 0.33, p = 0.57 (partial eta^2 = 0.09)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.15, p = 0.70 (r = 0.06)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.17, p = 0.68
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 4 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.43, p = 0.52 (partial eta^2 = 0.11)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 1.58, p = 0.22 (r = 0.22)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 1.17, p = 0.29
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib stress for SPM roi 4 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 0.13, p = 0.72 (partial eta^2 = 0.03)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 1.31, p = 0.26 (r = 0.21)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.77, p = 0.39
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 4 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.03, p = 0.87 (partial eta^2 = 0.01)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.47, p = 0.50 (r = 0.12)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.00, p = 0.95




HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS

| SPM roi 4 con 0002
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for hc nostress : 17
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for hc nostress : 18
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib nostress : 56
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for sib stress