emotion_con_2_roi_3_nsig

   08 30 2016     0 significant results (plus 4 one-sample T-tests)

INPUT AND OUTPUT FILE(S)

| Input file(1): SPM_roi_emotion_connect_4groups_s1_metafile_30-Aug-2016_RECODED_RECODED.txt
| Output file : emotion_con_2_roi_3.txt



NOTE: replacing the first column of all data with ascending subject number

SELECTING SUBJECTS


CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED CONTRASTS

| Available contrasts :
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected contrasts :
0002




CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED ROIS

| Available ROIs :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected ROIs :
3




NaN SUBJECTS






GROUP CHARACTERISTICS

| grouping variables: (1) group_hc_sib (2) stress_yn
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (1)
| group : hc nostress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.51 +/- 8.66 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (2)
| group : hc stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.48 +/- 8.72 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (3)
| group : sib nostress (n = 20)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.86 +/- 11.21 years
| total / males / females : 20 / 20 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (4)
| group : sib stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.73 +/- 7.42 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TOTAL
| mean age +/- SD : 33.68 +/- 9.04 years
| total / males / females : 74 / 74 / 0




MEAN AND SD

| hc nostress : mean for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : 0.76 +/- 0.41
| hc stress : mean for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : 0.48 +/- 0.49
| sib nostress : mean for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : 0.77 +/- 0.64
| sib stress : mean for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : 0.77 +/- 0.50




ONE-SAMPLE T-TESTS

| hc nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(17) = 7.83; p < 0.001 ***
| hc nostress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : mean = 0.76 +/- 0.10 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(17) = 4.16; p < 0.001 ***
| hc stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : mean = 0.48 +/- 0.11 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(19) = 5.40; p < 0.001 ***
| sib nostress (n = 20) : data for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : mean = 0.77 +/- 0.14 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(17) = 6.53; p < 0.001 ***
| sib stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : mean = 0.77 +/- 0.12 (SEM)




OUTLIERS and MISSINGS

| Outliers for group: hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : 11
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : 33
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : 56
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : 70
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 3 con 0002 (have value 9999)





All missings based on x_var value

| All missings:




ANOVA ACROSS GROUPS

| Main effect of group_hc_sib for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : F(1,70) = 1.61; p = 0.21
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Main effect of stress_yn for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : F(1,70) = 1.28; p = 0.26
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Interaction effect of group_hc_sib vs. stress_yn for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : F(1,70) = 1.40; p = 0.24
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05




TWO-SAMPLES TTESTS

| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. hc stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(34) = 1.86; p = 0.07
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(36) = -0.06; p = 0.95
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(34) = -0.11; p = 0.91
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(36) = -1.56; p = 0.13
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(34) = -1.79; p = 0.08
| sib nostress (N = 20) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 3 con 0002 : t(36) = -0.03; p = 0.97




REGRESSION ANALYSIS - Linear

| hc nostress : regression SPM roi 3 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 1.87, p = 0.19 (r = -0.32)
| hc stress : regression SPM roi 3 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 0.74, p = 0.40 (r = 0.21)
| sib nostress : regression SPM roi 3 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,19) = 0.30, p = 0.59 (r = -0.13)
| sib stress : regression SPM roi 3 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 0.55, p = 0.47 (r = 0.18)




regression across all groups for SPM roi 3 con 0002

| NOTE! main effect of group over all subgroups
| main effect subgroups F(3,66) = 1.39, p = 0.25 (partial eta^2 = 0.82)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 0.04, p = 0.84 (r = 0.00)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(3,66) = 0.90, p = 0.45
MANCOVAN - added as a check for aoctool
| main effect groups F(1,66) = 1.14, p = 0.35
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 0.68, p = 0.61
| interaction effect cortisol5 F(2,66) = 0.90, p = 0.45
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus hc stress for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 3.63, p = 0.07 (partial eta^2 = 0.92)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.19, p = 0.67 (r = -0.04)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 2.20, p = 0.15
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.02, p = 0.90 (partial eta^2 = 0.00)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 1.31, p = 0.26 (r = -0.19)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.12, p = 0.73
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 0.01, p = 0.91 (partial eta^2 = 0.00)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.02, p = 0.89 (r = -0.02)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 2.09, p = 0.16
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 2.38, p = 0.13 (partial eta^2 = 0.86)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.02, p = 0.89 (r = 0.02)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.89, p = 0.35
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib stress for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 2.42, p = 0.13 (partial eta^2 = 0.82)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 1.18, p = 0.28 (r = 0.23)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.11, p = 0.75
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 3 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.00, p = 0.97 (partial eta^2 = 0.00)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.00, p = 0.98 (r = 0.00)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.78, p = 0.38




HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS

| SPM roi 3 con 0002
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib nostress : 50
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib nostress : 56
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for sib stress