emotion_con_2_roi_10_nsig

   08 30 2016     0 significant results (plus 4 one-sample T-tests)

INPUT AND OUTPUT FILE(S)

| Input file(1): SPM_roi_emotion_connect_4groups_s1_metafile_30-Aug-2016_RECODED_RECODED.txt
| Output file : emotion_con_2_roi_10.txt



NOTE: replacing the first column of all data with ascending subject number

SELECTING SUBJECTS


CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED CONTRASTS

| Available contrasts :
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected contrasts :
0002




CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED ROIS

| Available ROIs :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected ROIs :
10




NaN SUBJECTS






GROUP CHARACTERISTICS

| grouping variables: (1) group_hc_sib (2) stress_yn
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (1)
| group : hc nostress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.51 +/- 8.66 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (2)
| group : hc stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.48 +/- 8.72 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (3)
| group : sib nostress (n = 20)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.86 +/- 11.21 years
| total / males / females : 20 / 20 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (4)
| group : sib stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.73 +/- 7.42 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TOTAL
| mean age +/- SD : 33.68 +/- 9.04 years
| total / males / females : 74 / 74 / 0




MEAN AND SD

| hc nostress : mean for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 0.59 +/- 0.33
| hc stress : mean for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 0.34 +/- 0.42
| sib nostress : mean for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 0.65 +/- 0.62
| sib stress : mean for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 0.51 +/- 0.38




ONE-SAMPLE T-TESTS

| hc nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(17) = 7.57; p < 0.001 ***
| hc nostress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : mean = 0.59 +/- 0.08 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(17) = 3.47; p < 0.01 **
| hc stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : mean = 0.34 +/- 0.10 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(19) = 4.68; p < 0.001 ***
| sib nostress (n = 20) : data for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : mean = 0.65 +/- 0.14 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(17) = 5.73; p < 0.001 ***
| sib stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : mean = 0.51 +/- 0.09 (SEM)




OUTLIERS and MISSINGS

| Outliers for group: hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 7
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 32
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Dixon's Q outlier for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 49
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 49
| Outlier for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 49
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : 61
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 10 con 0002 (have value 9999)





All missings based on x_var value

| All missings:




ANOVA ACROSS GROUPS

| Main effect of group_hc_sib for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : F(1,70) = 1.11; p = 0.30
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Main effect of stress_yn for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : F(1,70) = 3.34; p = 0.07
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Interaction effect of group_hc_sib vs. stress_yn for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : F(1,70) = 0.28; p = 0.60
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05




TWO-SAMPLES TTESTS

| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. hc stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(34) = 1.98; p = 0.06
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(36) = -0.34; p = 0.73
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(34) = 0.69; p = 0.49
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(36) = -1.76; p = 0.09
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(34) = -1.26; p = 0.21
| sib nostress (N = 20) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 10 con 0002 : t(36) = 0.82; p = 0.42




REGRESSION ANALYSIS - Linear

| hc nostress : regression SPM roi 10 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 0.69, p = 0.42 (r = -0.20)
| hc stress : regression SPM roi 10 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 1.40, p = 0.25 (r = 0.28)
| sib nostress : regression SPM roi 10 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,19) = 0.16, p = 0.69 (r = -0.09)
| sib stress : regression SPM roi 10 con 0002 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 0.64, p = 0.44 (r = 0.20)




regression across all groups for SPM roi 10 con 0002

| NOTE! main effect of group over all subgroups
| main effect subgroups F(3,66) = 1.51, p = 0.22 (partial eta^2 = 0.82)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 0.02, p = 0.89 (r = 0.04)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(3,66) = 0.73, p = 0.54
MANCOVAN - added as a check for aoctool
| main effect groups F(1,66) = 1.12, p = 0.36
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 0.55, p = 0.70
| interaction effect cortisol5 F(2,66) = 0.73, p = 0.54
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus hc stress for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 3.86, p = 0.06 (partial eta^2 = 0.90)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.03, p = 0.87 (r = 0.06)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 2.20, p = 0.15
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.14, p = 0.71 (partial eta^2 = 0.05)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.52, p = 0.47 (r = -0.12)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.01, p = 0.92
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 0.48, p = 0.49 (partial eta^2 = 0.11)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.02, p = 0.88 (r = 0.02)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 1.29, p = 0.26
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 2.92, p = 0.10 (partial eta^2 = 0.90)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.00, p = 0.94 (r = 0.05)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 1.03, p = 0.32
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib stress for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 1.03, p = 0.32 (partial eta^2 = 0.34)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 1.68, p = 0.20 (r = 0.25)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.42, p = 0.52
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 10 con 0002
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.64, p = 0.43 (partial eta^2 = 0.30)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.00, p = 0.95 (r = 0.01)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.55, p = 0.46




HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS

| SPM roi 10 con 0002
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for hc stress : 34
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib nostress : 49
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for sib stress