emotion_con_1_roi_3

   08 30 2016     7 significant results (plus 3 one-sample T-tests)

INPUT AND OUTPUT FILE(S)

| Input file(1): SPM_roi_emotion_connect_4groups_s1_metafile_30-Aug-2016_RECODED_RECODED.txt
| Output file : emotion_con_1_roi_3.txt



NOTE: replacing the first column of all data with ascending subject number

SELECTING SUBJECTS


CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED CONTRASTS

| Available contrasts :
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected contrasts :
0001




CHECKING AVAILABLE AND SELECTED ROIS

| Available ROIs :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Selected ROIs :
3




NaN SUBJECTS






GROUP CHARACTERISTICS

| grouping variables: (1) group_hc_sib (2) stress_yn
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (1)
| group : hc nostress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.51 +/- 8.66 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (2)
| group : hc stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.48 +/- 8.72 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (3)
| group : sib nostress (n = 20)
| mean age +/- SD : 34.86 +/- 11.21 years
| total / males / females : 20 / 20 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (4)
| group : sib stress (n = 18)
| mean age +/- SD : 32.73 +/- 7.42 years
| total / males / females : 18 / 18 / 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| TOTAL
| mean age +/- SD : 33.68 +/- 9.04 years
| total / males / females : 74 / 74 / 0




MEAN AND SD

| hc nostress : mean for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : 0.55 +/- 0.39
| hc stress : mean for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : 0.17 +/- 0.51
| sib nostress : mean for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : 0.59 +/- 0.55
| sib stress : mean for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : 0.55 +/- 0.43




ONE-SAMPLE T-TESTS

| hc nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 3 con 0001 : t(17) = 5.99; p < 0.001 ***
| hc nostress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : mean = 0.55 +/- 0.09 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 3 con 0001 : t(17) = 1.39; p = 0.18
| hc stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : mean = 0.17 +/- 0.12 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 3 con 0001 : t(19) = 4.77; p < 0.001 ***
| sib nostress (n = 20) : data for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : mean = 0.59 +/- 0.12 (SEM)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib stress : one-sample t-test SPM roi 3 con 0001 : t(17) = 5.38; p < 0.001 ***
| sib stress (n = 18) : data for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : mean = 0.55 +/- 0.10 (SEM)




OUTLIERS and MISSINGS

| Outliers for group: hc nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 3 con 0001
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : 18
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0001
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0001 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 3 con 0001 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No outliers based on Dixon's Q detected for SPM roi 3 con 0001
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : 25
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0001
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0001 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 3 con 0001 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib nostress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Dixon's Q outlier for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : 46
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : 46
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0001
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0001 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 3 con 0001 (have value 9999)

| Outliers for group: sib stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Dixon's Q outlier for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : 70
| Rosner's many outlier test for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : 70
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0001
| No outliers detected for SPM roi 3 con 0001 (when min and max removed)
| No missings detected for SPM roi 3 con 0001 (have value 9999)





All missings based on x_var value

| All missings:




ANOVA ACROSS GROUPS

| Main effect of group_hc_sib for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : F(1,70) = 3.53; p = 0.06
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Main effect of stress_yn for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : F(1,70) = 3.77; p = 0.06
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05
| Interaction effect of group_hc_sib vs. stress_yn for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : F(1,70) = 2.37; p = 0.13
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Tukey-Kramer: p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress LSD : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Bonferroni : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Dunn-Sidák : p > 0.05
| hc nostress vs. hc stress Scheffe : p > 0.05




TWO-SAMPLES TTESTS

| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. hc stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : t(34) = 2.56; p = 0.02 *
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : t(36) = -0.24; p = 0.81
| hc nostress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : t(34) = 0.05; p = 0.96
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib nostress (N = 20) for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : t(36) = -2.45; p = 0.02 *
| hc stress (N = 18) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : t(34) = -2.42; p = 0.02 *
| sib nostress (N = 20) vs. sib stress (N = 18) for SPM roi 3 con 0001 : t(36) = 0.28; p = 0.78




REGRESSION ANALYSIS - Linear

| hc nostress : regression SPM roi 3 con 0001 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 0.57, p = 0.46 (r = 0.19)
| hc stress : regression SPM roi 3 con 0001 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 0.47, p = 0.50 (r = 0.17)
| sib nostress : regression SPM roi 3 con 0001 by cortisol5 : F(1,19) = 0.38, p = 0.55 (r = -0.14)
| sib stress : regression SPM roi 3 con 0001 by cortisol5 : F(1,17) = 0.33, p = 0.58 (r = 0.14)




regression across all groups for SPM roi 3 con 0001

| NOTE! main effect of group over all subgroups
| main effect subgroups F(3,66) = 2.94, p = 0.04 * (partial eta^2 = 0.98)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 0.19, p = 0.67 (r = 0.09)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(3,66) = 0.50, p = 0.69
MANCOVAN - added as a check for aoctool
| main effect groups F(1,66) = 1.72, p = 0.13
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,66) = 0.42, p = 0.79
| interaction effect cortisol5 F(2,66) = 0.50, p = 0.69
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus hc stress for SPM roi 3 con 0001
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 5.82, p = 0.02 * (partial eta^2 = 0.98)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.96, p = 0.34 (r = 0.20)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.05, p = 0.82
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 3 con 0001
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.06, p = 0.81 (partial eta^2 = 0.02)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.02, p = 0.88 (r = -0.02)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.84, p = 0.36
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 3 con 0001
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 0.02, p = 0.90 (partial eta^2 = 0.00)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.85, p = 0.36 (r = 0.16)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.03, p = 0.87
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib nostress for SPM roi 3 con 0001
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 5.85, p = 0.02 * (partial eta^2 = 0.99)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.04, p = 0.84 (r = 0.03)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.79, p = 0.38
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| hc stress versus sib stress for SPM roi 3 con 0001
| main effect subgroups F(1,32) = 4.81, p = 0.04 * (partial eta^2 = 0.97)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.69, p = 0.41 (r = 0.20)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,32) = 0.12, p = 0.73
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| sib nostress versus sib stress for SPM roi 3 con 0001
| main effect subgroups F(1,34) = 0.07, p = 0.79 (partial eta^2 = 0.02)
| main effect cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.02, p = 0.89 (r = -0.02)
| interaction effect subgroups x cortisol5 F(1,34) = 0.69, p = 0.41




HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS

| SPM roi 3 con 0001
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for hc nostress : 17
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for hc nostress : 18
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for hc stress
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cook's distance (>1) observations for sib nostress : 56
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| No highly influential observations detected based on Cook's distance (>1) for sib stress